🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.